CPSM Physician Complaints in Manitoba: What Physicians Should Know
The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Manitoba (CPSM) regulates physicians under The Regulated Health Professions Act of Manitoba. Complaints are screened by the CEO/Registrar and referred to the Complaints Investigation Committee (CIC). Serious matters proceed to the Inquiry Committee for a formal hearing.
What do you need help with?
Choose your profession, situation, and province to begin a tailored response.
Select your profession, situation, and province to continue.
Governing statute
The Regulated Health Professions Act, CCSM c. R117 (RHPA Manitoba)
First-stage decision-maker
Complaints Investigation Committee
Registrant response window
Set by the Investigation Committee in writing (typically 30 days)
Mailing address
1000-1661 Portage Avenue Winnipeg, MB R3J 3T7
1-204-774-4344
Understanding the CPSM complaints process
Manitoba's RHPA is the procedural backbone for nurses, pharmacists, and physicians alike. CPSM's intake follows that shared statute: a complaint is screened by the Registrar, then referred to the Complaints Investigation Committee (CIC), which includes both physician and public members.
Response deadlines are set in writing by the Investigation Committee, typically around 30 days, with extensions available on request. The CIC reviews the file on the written record. Most matters resolve at the CIC stage through dismissal, a censure, an undertaking, or a remedial requirement.
Serious matters or unresolved factual disputes are referred to the Inquiry Committee, which conducts a formal public hearing. Inquiry Committee decisions are posted on the CPSM register.
Manitoba's Physician Health Program is well-established, and the CPSM frequently uses fitness-to-practise pathways for health-driven complaints rather than treating them as disciplinary matters.
What's distinctive about the CPSM complaints process
- Manitoba's RHPA provides a shared procedural framework across regulated health professions.
- CIC includes both physician and public members, similar to the nursing College's CIC model.
- Inquiry Committee hearings and decisions are public and posted on the CPSM register.
- Strong Physician Health Program presence for fitness-to-practise files.
What triggers complaints against physicians in Manitoba
Administrative concerns
- •Practising on an expired or lapsed certificate of registration
- •Failing to meet continuing professional development (CPD) or revalidation requirements
- •Not reporting a change of practice location, employer, or hospital privileges in time
- •Failing to disclose a charge, finding, or condition on annual renewal
- •Inadequate or missing chart documentation discovered on audit
Conduct or practice concerns
- •Prescribing concerns (opioids, benzodiazepines, controlled drugs, off-label use)
- •Standard-of-care concerns raised by a patient, family, or another physician
- •Professional boundary or sexual abuse allegations (zero-tolerance regime in most provinces)
- •Communication concerns: tone, lack of informed consent, or perceived dismissiveness
- •Billing or OHIP/MSP/AHCIP irregularities flagged by the provincial insurer
- •Confidentiality or privacy breaches under PHIPA / PIPA / HIA
- •Concerns about fitness to practise (health, cognition, substance use)
How a CPSM complaint typically moves
- 1
Complaint received and acknowledged
The College receives the written complaint, assigns a file number, and sends a written acknowledgement to the complainant and the physician.
- 2
Notice to the physician
You are sent the complaint and supporting materials, and invited to provide a written response. The College's investigations or professional conduct staff is typically your point of contact.
- 3
Investigation
An investigator gathers records (chart, billing, hospital file, expert opinions), interviews witnesses, and asks you targeted questions. You have a duty to cooperate but you are entitled to counsel and to decline to admit fault.
- 4
Written response from the physician
You submit a written response addressing each allegation, ideally with supporting documentation and, where appropriate, a peer-reviewed clinical rationale. This is usually the single most important document on the file.
- 5
Review by the Complaints Investigation Committee
The Complaints Investigation Committee reviews the investigation file and your response on the record. It can take no action, issue advice or a caution, accept an undertaking, require remediation (SCERP), or refer the matter forward.
- 6
Possible referral to the Inquiry Committee
Serious matters or unresolved factual disputes may be referred to the Inquiry Committee for a formal hearing on the merits.
Possible outcomes
No further action or dismissal
The committee determines the complaint is unfounded, outside its jurisdiction, or does not warrant further action. The file is closed and (in most provinces) does not appear on the public register.
Advice, caution, or reminder
A non-disciplinary measure intended to support reflection on practice. Usually recorded on your College file; often not posted publicly.
Specified Continuing Education and Remediation Program (SCERP) or undertaking
A structured remedial plan, typically including coursework, a chart-stimulated recall, or a period of practice monitoring. Some appear on the public register.
Referral to discipline or formal hearing
A formal hearing-style proceeding before a panel that can issue findings of professional misconduct or incompetence and impose conditions, suspension, or licence revocation.
Suspension or revocation of certificate of registration
Reserved for the most serious findings, including sexual abuse, criminal-grade conduct, or repeated failures of practice. Always published on the College's public register.
Practical tips for physicians in Manitoba
- Read the College's notice carefully. Your deadline, the scope of the allegations, and the specific information requested are spelled out in it.
- Notify CMPA (Canadian Medical Protective Association) the same day you receive the complaint; CMPA assistance typically includes legal representation.
- Preserve all relevant records immediately: chart entries, hospital records, billing data, on-call schedules, and any text or email communications with the patient or colleagues.
- Do not contact the complainant directly. Communicate only through the College or through counsel.
- Be calm, factual, and chronological in your written response. The committee reviews the file on the record; the quality of that document drives the outcome.
Explore More Licensing Guidance
If you're navigating a licensing board complaint or investigation, these resources may help:
Frequently asked questions
Talk to BoardWise
Not sure where your matter fits? Send us a short message and we'll point you to the right next step.

Not Sure If We're Right for You?
Send us a quick message. We're happy to answer questions about how BoardWise works and whether it might help with your situation.
We typically respond within one business day.
Prefer to email us directly?
support@boardwise.onlineOther physicians guides
Alberta
College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta (CPSA)
British Columbia
College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia (CPSBC)
New Brunswick
College of Physicians and Surgeons of New Brunswick (CPSNB)
Newfoundland and Labrador
College of Physicians and Surgeons of Newfoundland and Labrador (CPSNL)
Northwest Territories
Government of the Northwest Territories, Professional Licensing (Medical Profession) (GNWT-PL)
Nova Scotia
College of Physicians and Surgeons of Nova Scotia (CPSNS)