NSRASLP Speech-Language Pathologist Complaints in Nova Scotia: What Speech-Language Pathologists Should Know
The Nova Scotia Regulator of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology (NSRASLP) is the regulator for speech-language pathologists in Nova Scotia under Regulated Health Professions Act, SNS 2023, c. 15 (in force September 15, 2025). Most concerns are reviewed by the Complaints Committee. Serious matters may be referred to the Hearing Committee for a formal hearing.
What do you need help with?
Choose your profession, situation, and province to begin a tailored response.
Select your profession, situation, and province to continue.
Governing statute
Regulated Health Professions Act, SNS 2023, c. 15 (in force September 15, 2025)
First-stage decision-maker
Complaints Committee
Registrant response window
No fixed acknowledgement deadline post-RHPA transition
Mailing address
PO Box 23170 Dartmouth, NS B3A 4T1
Online form at nsraslp.ca
Understanding the NSRASLP complaints process
Speech-Language Pathologists in Nova Scotia are accountable to the Nova Scotia Regulator of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology (NSRASLP). When a concern is raised about a speech-language pathologist, intake staff log it, send the speech-language pathologist a copy of the materials, and invite a written response. The complaints stream is built around the file the Complaints Committee reviews — the quality and clarity of your written response is the most important factor at this level.
Most matters resolve at the Complaints Committee stage through dismissal, advice, a remedial undertaking, or a consent-style resolution. Serious matters that are not resolvable at intake may be referred to the Hearing Committee for a formal hearing on the record. Hearing decisions are typically posted on the regulator's public register.
Engage your professional liability insurer the day you receive the notice. Do not contact the complainant directly. Preserve all relevant records (clinical notes, billing, schedules, communications). Read the regulator's notice carefully — your deadline, the scope of the allegations, and what is being asked of you are spelled out in it.
What's distinctive about the NSRASLP complaints process
- Major transition September 15, 2025 to the omnibus RHPA; renamed to NSRASLP
- Governance shifted from Council to a Board of Directors (4 registrants + 3 public reps)
- Investigations cover misconduct, conduct unbecoming, incompetence, and incapacity
- Registrar may direct other resolution pathways short of formal investigation
- Currently consulting on a draft guideline for school-based SLPs
What triggers complaints against speech-language pathologists in Nova Scotia
Administrative concerns
- •Practicing without valid registration
- •Non-compliance with continuing professional development
- •Failure to report as required
- •Advertising or fee transparency issues
- •Breach of privacy or confidentiality
Conduct or practice concerns
- •Professional misconduct or conduct unbecoming
- •Clinical incompetence
- •Incapacity affecting safe practice
- •Sexual misconduct or boundary violations
- •Failure to meet professional standards of care
How a NSRASLP complaint typically moves
- 1
Complaint received and acknowledged
The regulator receives the written complaint, assigns a file number, and sends a written acknowledgement to the complainant and the speech-language pathologist.
- 2
Notice to the speech-language pathologist
You are sent the complaint and supporting materials, and invited to provide a written response. The regulator's complaints staff is typically your point of contact.
- 3
Investigation
An investigator gathers records, may interview witnesses, and asks targeted questions. You have a duty to cooperate but you are entitled to counsel.
- 4
Written response from the speech-language pathologist
You submit a written response addressing each allegation with supporting documentation. This is usually the single most important document on the file.
- 5
Review by the Complaints Committee
The Complaints Committee reviews the file on the record. It can take no action, issue advice or a caution, accept an undertaking, require remediation, or refer the matter forward.
- 6
Possible referral to the Hearing Committee
Serious matters or unresolved factual disputes may be referred to the Hearing Committee for a formal hearing on the merits.
Possible outcomes
No further action or dismissal
The committee determines the complaint is unfounded, outside its jurisdiction, or does not warrant further action. The file is closed and (in most jurisdictions) does not appear on the public register.
Advice, caution, or reminder
A non-disciplinary measure intended to support reflection on practice. Usually recorded on your regulator file; often not posted publicly.
Remedial undertaking or consent agreement
A structured remedial plan, typically including coursework, mentorship, or a period of practice monitoring. Some appear on the public register.
Referral to discipline or formal hearing
A formal hearing-style proceeding before a panel that can issue findings of professional misconduct or incompetence and impose conditions, suspension, or licence revocation.
Suspension or revocation of registration
Reserved for the most serious findings, including sexual abuse, criminal-grade conduct, or repeated practice failures. Always published on the regulator's public register.
Practical tips for speech-language pathologists in Nova Scotia
- Read the regulator's notice carefully. Your deadline, the scope of the allegations, and the specific information requested are spelled out in it.
- Notify your professional liability insurer the same day you receive the complaint — coverage typically includes legal representation.
- Preserve all relevant records immediately: clinical notes, billing data, schedules, and any text or email communications with the patient or colleagues.
- Do not contact the complainant directly. Communicate only through the regulator or through counsel.
- Be calm, factual, and chronological in your written response. The committee reviews the file on the record; the quality of that document drives the outcome.
Explore More Licensing Guidance
If you're navigating a licensing board complaint or investigation, these resources may help:
Frequently asked questions
Talk to BoardWise
Not sure where your matter fits? Send us a short message and we'll point you to the right next step.
Not Sure If We're Right for You?
Send us a quick message. We're happy to answer questions about how BoardWise works and whether it might help with your situation.
We typically respond within one business day.
Prefer to email us directly?
support@boardwise.onlineOther speech-language pathologists guides
Alberta
Alberta College of Speech-Language Pathologists and Audiologists (ACSLPA)
British Columbia
College of Health and Care Professionals of British Columbia (CHCPBC)
Manitoba
College of Audiologists and Speech-Language Pathologists of Manitoba (CASLPM)
New Brunswick
Regulatory College of Audiologists and Speech-Language Pathologists of New Brunswick (RCASLPNB)
Newfoundland and Labrador
College of Audiologists and Speech Language Pathologists – Newfoundland and Labrador (within the NL Council of Health Professionals) (CASLP-NL)
Northwest Territories
No formal regulatory college for SLPs exists in the Northwest Territories (NTHSSA / GNWT)