CASLPO Speech-Language Pathologist Complaints in Ontario: What Speech-Language Pathologists Should Know
The College of Audiologists and Speech-Language Pathologists of Ontario (CASLPO) is the regulator for speech-language pathologists in Ontario under Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology Act, 1991, S.O. 1991, c. 19; Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991. Most concerns are reviewed by the Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee (ICRC). Serious matters may be referred to the Discipline Committee for a formal hearing.
What do you need help with?
Choose your profession, situation, and province to begin a tailored response.
Select your profession, situation, and province to continue.
Governing statute
Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology Act, 1991, S.O. 1991, c. 19; Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991
First-stage decision-maker
Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee (ICRC)
Registrant response window
Complaint acknowledged within 14 days; registrant given 30 days to respond
Mailing address
175 Bloor Street East, North Tower, Suite 601 Toronto, ON M4W 3R8
416-975-5347
Understanding the CASLPO complaints process
Speech-Language Pathologists in Ontario are accountable to the College of Audiologists and Speech-Language Pathologists of Ontario (CASLPO). When a concern is raised about a speech-language pathologist, intake staff log it, send the speech-language pathologist a copy of the materials, and invite a written response. The complaints stream is built around the file the Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee (ICRC) reviews — the quality and clarity of your written response is the most important factor at this level.
Most matters resolve at the Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee (ICRC) stage through dismissal, advice, a remedial undertaking, or a consent-style resolution. Serious matters that are not resolvable at intake may be referred to the Discipline Committee for a formal hearing on the record. Hearing decisions are typically posted on the regulator's public register.
Engage your professional liability insurer the day you receive the notice. Do not contact the complainant directly. Preserve all relevant records (clinical notes, billing, schedules, communications). Read the regulator's notice carefully — your deadline, the scope of the allegations, and what is being asked of you are spelled out in it.
What's distinctive about the CASLPO complaints process
- Participates in the Cross Provincial Practice (CPP) Certificate program with AB, MB, NB and SK
- Offers voluntary, confidential Alternative Dispute Resolution
- ICRC operates two panels — one for audiology and one for SLP
- Sexual Abuse Prevention Program funds therapy for patients sexually abused by a registrant
- No time limitation for filing a complaint
What triggers complaints against speech-language pathologists in Ontario
Administrative concerns
- •Fees and billing disputes
- •Advertising not meeting standards
- •Supervision of Communication Disorder Assistants or students
- •Failure to provide records
- •Confidentiality and privacy breaches
Conduct or practice concerns
- •Standard of care concerns
- •Appropriateness of clinical services
- •Professional boundaries and sexual abuse
- •Communication issues with clients/families
- •Conduct unbecoming the profession
How a CASLPO complaint typically moves
- 1
Complaint received and acknowledged
The regulator receives the written complaint, assigns a file number, and sends a written acknowledgement to the complainant and the speech-language pathologist.
- 2
Notice to the speech-language pathologist
You are sent the complaint and supporting materials, and invited to provide a written response. The regulator's complaints staff is typically your point of contact.
- 3
Investigation
An investigator gathers records, may interview witnesses, and asks targeted questions. You have a duty to cooperate but you are entitled to counsel.
- 4
Written response from the speech-language pathologist
You submit a written response addressing each allegation with supporting documentation. This is usually the single most important document on the file.
- 5
Review by the Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee (ICRC)
The Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee (ICRC) reviews the file on the record. It can take no action, issue advice or a caution, accept an undertaking, require remediation, or refer the matter forward.
- 6
Possible referral to the Discipline Committee
Serious matters or unresolved factual disputes may be referred to the Discipline Committee for a formal hearing on the merits.
Possible outcomes
No further action or dismissal
The committee determines the complaint is unfounded, outside its jurisdiction, or does not warrant further action. The file is closed and (in most jurisdictions) does not appear on the public register.
Advice, caution, or reminder
A non-disciplinary measure intended to support reflection on practice. Usually recorded on your regulator file; often not posted publicly.
Remedial undertaking or consent agreement
A structured remedial plan, typically including coursework, mentorship, or a period of practice monitoring. Some appear on the public register.
Referral to discipline or formal hearing
A formal hearing-style proceeding before a panel that can issue findings of professional misconduct or incompetence and impose conditions, suspension, or licence revocation.
Suspension or revocation of registration
Reserved for the most serious findings, including sexual abuse, criminal-grade conduct, or repeated practice failures. Always published on the regulator's public register.
Practical tips for speech-language pathologists in Ontario
- Read the regulator's notice carefully. Your deadline, the scope of the allegations, and the specific information requested are spelled out in it.
- Notify your professional liability insurer the same day you receive the complaint — coverage typically includes legal representation.
- Preserve all relevant records immediately: clinical notes, billing data, schedules, and any text or email communications with the patient or colleagues.
- Do not contact the complainant directly. Communicate only through the regulator or through counsel.
- Be calm, factual, and chronological in your written response. The committee reviews the file on the record; the quality of that document drives the outcome.
Explore More Licensing Guidance
If you're navigating a licensing board complaint or investigation, these resources may help:
Frequently asked questions
Talk to BoardWise
Not sure where your matter fits? Send us a short message and we'll point you to the right next step.
Not Sure If We're Right for You?
Send us a quick message. We're happy to answer questions about how BoardWise works and whether it might help with your situation.
We typically respond within one business day.
Prefer to email us directly?
support@boardwise.onlineOther speech-language pathologists guides
Alberta
Alberta College of Speech-Language Pathologists and Audiologists (ACSLPA)
British Columbia
College of Health and Care Professionals of British Columbia (CHCPBC)
Manitoba
College of Audiologists and Speech-Language Pathologists of Manitoba (CASLPM)
New Brunswick
Regulatory College of Audiologists and Speech-Language Pathologists of New Brunswick (RCASLPNB)
Newfoundland and Labrador
College of Audiologists and Speech Language Pathologists – Newfoundland and Labrador (within the NL Council of Health Professionals) (CASLP-NL)
Northwest Territories
No formal regulatory college for SLPs exists in the Northwest Territories (NTHSSA / GNWT)