COTO Occupational Therapist Complaints in Ontario: What Occupational Therapists Should Know
The College of Occupational Therapists of Ontario (COTO) is the regulator for occupational therapists in Ontario under Occupational Therapy Act, 1991, SO 1991, c 33; Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991, SO 1991, c 18. Most concerns are reviewed by the Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee (ICRC). Serious matters may be referred to the Discipline Committee for a formal hearing.
What do you need help with?
Choose your profession, situation, and province to begin a tailored response.
Select your profession, situation, and province to continue.
Governing statute
Occupational Therapy Act, 1991, SO 1991, c 33; Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991, SO 1991, c 18
First-stage decision-maker
Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee (ICRC)
Registrant response window
Generally within 150 days of receipt under RHPA provisions, subject to extension
Mailing address
20 Bay Street, Suite 900, PO Box 78 Toronto, ON M5J 2N8
416-214-1177
Understanding the COTO complaints process
Occupational Therapists in Ontario are accountable to the College of Occupational Therapists of Ontario (COTO). When a concern is raised about a occupational therapist, intake staff log it, send the occupational therapist a copy of the materials, and invite a written response. The complaints stream is built around the file the Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee (ICRC) reviews — the quality and clarity of your written response is the most important factor at this level.
Most matters resolve at the Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee (ICRC) stage through dismissal, advice, a remedial undertaking, or a consent-style resolution. Serious matters that are not resolvable at intake may be referred to the Discipline Committee for a formal hearing on the record. Hearing decisions are typically posted on the regulator's public register.
Engage your professional liability insurer the day you receive the notice. Do not contact the complainant directly. Preserve all relevant records (clinical notes, billing, schedules, communications). Read the regulator's notice carefully — your deadline, the scope of the allegations, and what is being asked of you are spelled out in it.
What's distinctive about the COTO complaints process
- Operates under Ontario's RHPA, which sets out detailed rights for complainants
- Complaints can be submitted in writing, or as an audio or video recording
- ICRC has the power to issue cautions, require an OT to appear, and impose terms on practice
- Decisions of the Discipline Committee and HPARB are published
- Separate Fitness to Practise Committee handles incapacity cases
What triggers complaints against occupational therapists in Ontario
Administrative concerns
- •Practicing without COTO registration or with a lapsed certificate
- •Failure to complete mandatory quality assurance activities
- •Non-compliance with college-ordered terms, conditions, or limitations
- •Failure to respond to or cooperate with ICRC investigations
Conduct or practice concerns
- •Incompetent or unsafe occupational therapy practice
- •Sexual abuse or sexual misconduct
- •Breach of client confidentiality or privacy
- •Conflict of interest or professional boundary violation
- •Fraudulent billing, misrepresentation, or falsification of records
How a COTO complaint typically moves
- 1
Complaint received and acknowledged
The regulator receives the written complaint, assigns a file number, and sends a written acknowledgement to the complainant and the occupational therapist.
- 2
Notice to the occupational therapist
You are sent the complaint and supporting materials, and invited to provide a written response. The regulator's complaints staff is typically your point of contact.
- 3
Investigation
An investigator gathers records, may interview witnesses, and asks targeted questions. You have a duty to cooperate but you are entitled to counsel.
- 4
Written response from the occupational therapist
You submit a written response addressing each allegation with supporting documentation. This is usually the single most important document on the file.
- 5
Review by the Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee (ICRC)
The Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee (ICRC) reviews the file on the record. It can take no action, issue advice or a caution, accept an undertaking, require remediation, or refer the matter forward.
- 6
Possible referral to the Discipline Committee
Serious matters or unresolved factual disputes may be referred to the Discipline Committee for a formal hearing on the merits.
Possible outcomes
No further action or dismissal
The committee determines the complaint is unfounded, outside its jurisdiction, or does not warrant further action. The file is closed and (in most jurisdictions) does not appear on the public register.
Advice, caution, or reminder
A non-disciplinary measure intended to support reflection on practice. Usually recorded on your regulator file; often not posted publicly.
Remedial undertaking or consent agreement
A structured remedial plan, typically including coursework, mentorship, or a period of practice monitoring. Some appear on the public register.
Referral to discipline or formal hearing
A formal hearing-style proceeding before a panel that can issue findings of professional misconduct or incompetence and impose conditions, suspension, or licence revocation.
Suspension or revocation of registration
Reserved for the most serious findings, including sexual abuse, criminal-grade conduct, or repeated practice failures. Always published on the regulator's public register.
Practical tips for occupational therapists in Ontario
- Read the regulator's notice carefully. Your deadline, the scope of the allegations, and the specific information requested are spelled out in it.
- Notify your professional liability insurer the same day you receive the complaint — coverage typically includes legal representation.
- Preserve all relevant records immediately: clinical notes, billing data, schedules, and any text or email communications with the patient or colleagues.
- Do not contact the complainant directly. Communicate only through the regulator or through counsel.
- Be calm, factual, and chronological in your written response. The committee reviews the file on the record; the quality of that document drives the outcome.
Explore More Licensing Guidance
If you're navigating a licensing board complaint or investigation, these resources may help:
Frequently asked questions
Talk to BoardWise
Not sure where your matter fits? Send us a short message and we'll point you to the right next step.
Not Sure If We're Right for You?
Send us a quick message. We're happy to answer questions about how BoardWise works and whether it might help with your situation.
We typically respond within one business day.
Prefer to email us directly?
support@boardwise.onlineOther occupational therapists guides
Alberta
Alberta College of Occupational Therapists (ACOT)
British Columbia
College of Health and Care Professionals of British Columbia (CHCPBC)
Manitoba
College of Occupational Therapists of Manitoba (COTM)
New Brunswick
New Brunswick Association of Occupational Therapists (NBAOT)
Newfoundland and Labrador
Newfoundland and Labrador Occupational Therapy Board (NLOTB)
Northwest Territories
Government of Northwest Territories — Department of Health and Social Services (GNWT-HSS)